Mannis v. State
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Cite as 2009 Ark. App. 616
ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
DIVISION III
CACR09-172
No.
Opinion Delivered
C. SCOTT MANNIS
APPEAL FROM THE ARKANSAS
COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
[NO. CR-08-25, CR-08-26]
APPELLANT
V.
STATE OF ARKANSAS
September 30, 2009
HONORABLE DAVID G. HENRY,
JUDGE
APPELLEE
REBRIEFING ORDERED
LARRY D. VAUGHT, Chief Judge
C. Scott Mannis appeals “from the Order” entered against him on the “7th day of
November 2008” by the Arkansas County Circuit Court. However, the caption of his notice
of appeal references two separate cases—“NO. CR-08-25 and CR-08-26.” Indeed, these two
cases, each charging Mannis with harassment, were heard together. And, the sentences—ten
days in jail and a $355 fine—were ordered to run concurrently. Further, on appeal Mannis
provides reasoned argument that the evidence was insufficient to support either of his
harassment convictions because he lacked the requisite intent to harass the victim. We note,
however, that Mannis’s addendum includes the trial court’s order in CR08-25 from which
his appeal is taken.
Because the order in CR08-26 is omitted from Mannis’s addendum, his brief is not
1
Cite as 2009 Ark. App. 616
in compliance with Rule 4-2 of the Rules of the Arkansas Supreme Court and the Arkansas
Court of Appeals. Rule 4-2(a)(8) requires that an appellant’s addendum shall contain all
“relevant pleadings, documents, or exhibits essential to the understanding of the case.”
Mannis’s addendum is thus deficient, and we direct him to cure the deficiency by filing a
substituted abstract, addendum, and brief within fifteen days from the date of the entry of this
order. Rule 4-2(b)(3).
Rebriefing ordered.
HART and GRUBER, JJ., agree.
2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
