Darrick Anderson v. State of Arkansas
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DIVISION IV
ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION
K AREN R. B AKER, Judge
CACR05-981
JUNE 28, 2006
DARRICK ANDERSON
APPELLANT
v.
APPEAL FROM THE GARLAND COUNTY
CIRCUIT COURT
[NO. CR2002-470 IV]
HONORABLE
EDWARD
SMITHERMAN, CIRCUIT JUDGE
STATE OF ARKANSAS
T.
APPELLEE
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED
The trial court sentenced appellant Darrick Anderson to seven years in the Arkansas
Department of Correction following the court’s revocation of appellant’s probation stemming from
the charge of possession of a controlled substance. The revocation was based upon the trial court’s
determination that appellant had violated the terms of his probation by being in possession of a
firearm. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Rule 4-3(j) of the Rules of the
Arkansas Supreme Court and Court of Appeals, appellant’s counsel has filed a motion to withdraw
on grounds that the appeal is without merit. This motion is accompanied by an abstract and brief
referring to everything in the record that might arguably support an appeal and a statement of
reasons why none of those rulings would be a meritorious ground for reversal.
The clerk of this court furnished appellant with a copy of his counsel’s brief and notified him
of his right to file a pro se brief within thirty days. Appellant did not file a brief.
From our review of the record and the briefs presented to us, we find compliance with Rule
4-3(j), and that the appeal is without merit. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to be relieved is granted
and the judgments of conviction are affirmed.
Affirmed.
VAUGHT and CRABTREE , JJ., agree.
-2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
