Daniel Brownfield v. State of Arkansas

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

JUDGE JOSEPHINE LINKER HART

DIVISION II

DANIEL BROWNFIELD

APPELLANT

V.

STATE OF ARKANSAS

APPELLEE

CACR02-206

January 8, 2003

APPEAL FROM THE JACKSON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT

[NO. 2001-114]

HONORABLE HAROLD ERWIN,

CIRCUIT JUDGE

AFFIRMED

After the jury found Daniel Brownfield guilty of five counts of theft of property and one count of breaking or entering, the trial court sentenced appellant on each count to ten years' incarceration with the sentences to run consecutively for a total of sixty years' imprisonment in the Arkansas Department of Corrections. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Ark. R. Sup. Ct. 4-3(j)(1)(2002), appellant's counsel filed a motion to withdraw, abstracted the record, and submitted a brief that listed all rulings adverse to appellant, and explained why each adverse ruling does not present a meritorious ground for reversal. Although the appellant was furnished with a copy of counsel's brief and notified of his right to file pro se points for reversal within thirty days, appellant failed to file such points.

We have reviewed counsel's brief and abstract and agree that none of the rulingsadverse to appellant provided a meritorious ground for reversal. Consequently, we grant counsel's motion to be relieved as counsel and affirm appellant's conviction.

Affirmed.

Pittman and Bird, JJ., agree.