Dorothy A. Jones v. Director et al.

Annotate this Case
Dorothy A. JONES v. DIRECTOR of Arkansas
Employment Security Department

E 97-230                                           ___ S.W.2d ___

                  Court of Appeals of Arkansas
                Opinion delivered March 25, 1998


1.   Unemployment compensation -- motion to strike -- no need to
     file in employment security cases. -- There is no need to file
     a motion to strike in employment security cases; the court of
     appeals does not consider additional evidence filed except as
     ordered by the court and directed to the Board of Review
     pursuant to Ark. Code Ann.  11-10-529 (c)(2)(A)(Repl. 1997). 

2.   Unemployment compensation -- motion to strike additional
     information filed by appellant -- cumulative and unnecessary. 
     A motion to strike additional information in employment
     security cases is cumulative and unnecessary; the decision of
     the Board of Review may be affirmed without opinion pursuant
     to Rule 5-2(b) of the Rules of the Supreme Court and Court of
     Appeals, without consideration of the additional information
     submitted.


     Motion to Strike; cumulative and unnecessary.
     Appellant, pro se.
     Phyllis Edwards, for appellee.

     Per Curiam.
      The Director of the Employment Security Department has filed
a Motion to Strike additional information filed by the appellant,
Dorothy A. Jones, with her petition for review.  However, there is
no need to file such a motion in Employment Security cases; the
decision of the Board of Review in this case was affirmed without
opinion on March 18, 1998, pursuant to Rule 5-2(b) of the Rules of
the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals, without consideration of
the additional information submitted.  This court does not consider
additional evidence filed except as ordered by this court and
directed to the Board of Review pursuant to Ark. Code Ann.  11-10-
529 (c)(2)(A)(Repl. 1997).  See also Fry v. Director of Labor, 16
Ark. App. 204, 698 S.W.2d 816 (1985).
     In the future, the Director should be advised that a Motion to
Strike for the reason set out above is cumulative and unnecessary.
     It is so ordered.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.