Michael Smith, Jr. v. State of Arkansas
Annotate this Case(Download the WordPerfect format here.)
Michael SMITH, Jr. v. STATE of Arkansas
CA CR 98-134___ S.W.2d ___
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
En Banc
Opinion delivered July 1, 1998
Attorney & client -- motion for substitution of counsel remanded. -- Where
appellant, who had filed an affidavit of indigency and had
been represented by appointed counsel, was subsequently able
to retain private counsel and had filed a motion for
substitution of counsel, the appellate court remanded the case
to the trial judge who entered the finding of indigency so
that the cost of the transcript could be assessed against
appellant and ordered paid by him; the trial court was
directed to grant appellant's motion for substitution of
counsel upon payment of the transcript cost.
Appeal from Pulaski Circuit Court, Seventh Division; John B.
Plegge, Judge; Motion for Substitution of Counsel remanded.
Appellant, pro se.
No response.
Per Curiam.
Michael Smith has filed a motion to substitute Alvin D. Clay
as his attorney in place of William R. Simpson, Jr., on the appeal
of his conviction in the Pulaski County Circuit Court, Seventh
Division. On February 3, 1997, William R. Simpson, Jr., was
appointed counsel for appellant by the trial judge, who found thatappellant was unable to obtain effective representation of counsel
without substantial financial hardship to himself or his family
after appellant filed an affidavit of indigency. Accordingly,
appellant received a trial transcript paid for by the State of
Arkansas.
It now appears that appellant has been able to retain private
counsel by whom he is willing to be represented (Alvin Clay).
Therefore, we remand the case to the trial judge who entered the
finding of indigency so that the cost of the transcript can beassessed against appellant and ordered paid by him. Upon payment
of that cost, the trial court is directed to grant appellant's
motion for substitution of counsel. Appellant's brief will be due
in this court within thirty days from the date that the trial court
grants the motion for substitution of counsel.
Pittman and Roaf, JJ., would certify to Supreme Court.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.