Steve May v The Honorable Sheldon H. Weisberg, et al
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA STEVE MAY, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ) THE HONORABLE SHELDON H. WEISBERG, ) JON W. THOMPSON, JOHN C. GEMMILL, ) JUDGES OF THE COURT OF APPEALS, ) DIVISION ONE, in and for the State ) of Arizona, ) ) Respondents, ) and ) ) BETSEY BAYLESS, as Secretary of ) State of the State of Arizona, ) acting in her official capacity; ) CAROL SPRINGER, as Treasurer of ) the State of Arizona, acting in ) her official capacity; and the ) CITIZENS CLEAN ELECTIONS ) COMMISSION; and ARIZONANS FOR ) CLEAN ELECTIONS, ) ) Real Parties in Interest. ) ) ____________________________________) Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-02-0206-SA Court of Appeals Division One No. 1 CA-SA 02-0073 Maricopa County Superior Court No. CV 2001-006078 NOTICE OF RECUSAL On July 5, Justice Feldman filed a Disclosure advising that he made a voluntary donation to the Clean Elections Fund in 2001. As his Disclosure indicated, Justice Feldman s contribution was and is permitted under the governing statutes of the State of Arizona. This case does not challenge the validity of voluntary contributions, the existence of the Commission, or the Commission s use of funds obtained through voluntary contributions such as the one Justice Feldman made. The contribution is therefore not germane to any issue before this court. Justice Feldman also advised that he had consulted with the Chair of the Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee and requested an informal opinion on whether he should recuse himself from this case because of having made the donation. The Committee Chair has responded to Justice Feldman s request, saying that there appears to be no formal decision or opinion on the question and that Justice Feldman may not have to disqualify himself in [this] case simply because he donated money to the non-profit litigant in the case. Justice Feldman believes, however, that his contribution might lead a reasonable person to conclude that he strongly favors clean elections and therefore might not be impartial to the issues raised in the case. He therefore chooses not to participate in the consideration or decision of this case and thus recuses himself, even though not required to do so. Dated this ______ day of July, 2002. ______________________________ STANLEY G. FELDMAN, Justice 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
