Ex parte Kenneth Ray Cornelius.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Rel: 6/5/15 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 2290649), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is printed in Southern Reporter. SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA OCTOBER TERM, 2014-2015 ____________________ 1140673 ____________________ Ex parte Kenneth Ray Cornelius PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS (In re: Kenneth Ray Cornelius v. State of Alabama) (Cullman Circuit Court, CC-04-413; Court of Criminal Appeals, CR-14-0310) BRYAN, Justice. WRIT DENIED. NO OPINION. Stuart, Bolin, Parker, Main, and Wise, JJ., concur. Moore, C.J., and Murdock and Shaw, JJ., dissent. 1140673 MOORE, Chief Justice (dissenting). Kenneth Ray Cornelius petitions this Court for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeals dismissing Cornelius's appeal to that court. Today this Court denies his petition for a writ of certiorari. I respectfully dissent. Cornelius filed a motion for sentence reconsideration pursuant to § 13A-5-9.1, Ala. Code 1975 (which was repealed effective March 13, 2014, see Act No. 2014-165, Ala. Acts 2014), and Kirby v. State, 899 So. 2d 968 (Ala. 2004). Such a motion is referred to as a "Kirby motion." The Cullman Circuit Court denied Cornelius's Kirby motion, and Cornelius appealed the circuit court's decision to the Court of Criminal Appeals. On January 15, 2015, the Court of Criminal Appeals dismissed Cornelius's appeal on the ground that Cornelius's Kirby motion was filed on March 13, 2014, the effective date of the repeal of § 13A-5-9.1. The Court of Criminal Appeals determined that the circuit court lacked the jurisdiction to rule on Cornelius's Kirby motion on March 13, 2014, when the repeal of § 13A-5-9.1 became effective. Act No. 2014-165 states, in pertinent part: 2 1140673 "BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF ALABAMA: "Section 1. Section 13A-5-9.1, Code of Alabama 1975, is repealed. "Section 2. This act shall be applied prospectively only. Any case, on the effective date of this act, in which a motion filed pursuant to Section 13A-5-9.1, Code of Alabama 1975, is pending in the trial court ... shall not be affected by the act. "Section 3. This act shall become effective immediately following its passage and approval by the Governor, or its otherwise becoming law. "Approved March 13, 2014 "Time: 7:20 A.M." (Emphasis added.) Section 2 provides that any Kirby motion "pending" in the trial court on the effective date of the act (March 13, 2014) "shall not be affected by the act." Because in my view Cornelius's Kirby motion was filed on and therefore was pending on March 13, 2014, I believe the circuit court retained jurisdiction to consider Cornelius's Kirby motion. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent. I would grant the petition to determine whether the door on Cornelius's Kirby motion was closed a day too early. 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
