Ex parte Billy E. Pipkin and Sandra T. Pipkin. PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS (In re: Fairfield Place Homeowners Association, Inc. v. Billy E. Pipkin and Sandra T. Pipkin)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
REL:09/12/2014 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 2290649), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is printed in Southern Reporter. SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA SPECIAL TERM, 2014 ____________________ 1130985 ____________________ Ex parte Billy E. Pipkin and Sandra T. Pipkin PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS (In re: Fairfield Place Homeowners Association, Inc. v. Billy E. Pipkin and Sandra T. Pipkin) (Baldwin Circuit Court, CV-11-901334; Court of Civil Appeals, 2120267) MOORE, Chief Justice. The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied. 1130985 In denying the petition for the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Civil Appeals opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So. 2d 155 (1973). WRIT DENIED. Stuart, Parker, and Wise, JJ., concur. Shaw, J., concurs in the result. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
