Ex parte Hattie B. Shanklin. PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS (In re: Hattie B. Shanklin v. New Pilgrim Towers, L.P., and Schindler Elevator Corporation)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
REL: 9/24/2010 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0649), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is printed in Southern Reporter. SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA SPECIAL TERM, 2010 _________________________ 1091355 _________________________ Ex parte Hattie B. Shanklin PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS (In re: Hattie B. Shanklin v. New Pilgrim Towers, L.P., and Schindler Elevator Corporation) (Jefferson Circuit Court, CV-08-901381; Court of Civil Appeals, 2090076) WOODALL, Justice. The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied. 1091355 In denying the petition for the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Civil Appeals opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So. 2d 155 (1973). WRIT DENIED. Cobb, C.J., and Lyons, Stuart, Murdock, and Shaw, JJ., concur. 2 Smith, Bolin, Parker,
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
