J. Gregory Kennedy v. Boles Investment, Inc., and Ian Boles
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
REL: 06/25/2010 Notice: T h i s o p i n i o n i s s u b j e c t t o f o r m a l r e v i s i o n b e f o r e p u b l i c a t i o n i n t h e advance s h e e t s o f Southern R e p o r t e r . R e a d e r s a r e r e q u e s t e d t o n o t i f y t h e R e p o r t e r o f D e c i s i o n s , A l a b a m a A p p e l l a t e C o u r t s , 300 D e x t e r A v e n u e , M o n t g o m e r y , A l a b a m a 3 6 1 0 4 - 3 7 4 1 ( ( 3 3 4 ) 2 2 9 ¬ 0 6 4 9 ) , o f a n y t y p o g r a p h i c a l o r o t h e r e r r o r s , i n o r d e r t h a t c o r r e c t i o n s may b e made b e f o r e t h e o p i n i o n i s p r i n t e d i n Southern R e p o r t e r . SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA OCTOBER TERM, 2009-2010 1080607 J. Gregory Kennedy v. Boles Investment, Appeal from B a l d w i n C i r c u i t (CV-05-788) On A p p l i c a t i o n SMITH, I n c . , and I a n B o l e s Court f o r Rehearing Justice. On M a r c h 12, 2 0 1 0 , t h i s Court issued i t s o p i n i o n on o r i g i n a l s u b m i s s i o n , a f f i r m i n g t h e November 3, 2008, j u d g m e n t of the Baldwin Investment, Circuit Court i n favor I n c . ("BI"), and I a n B o l e s o f defendants Boles ( " B o l e s " ) , t h e owner o f 1080607 BI. J . G r e g o r y Kennedy, application for rehearing the plaintiff below, states that " [ t ] h e Opinion's in holding his that t h e N o v e m b e r 3, 2008, judgment i s a f i n a l judgment i s i n e r r o r because Court this foreclosure On after the a p p l i c a t i o n , at rehearing ordered overlooked 11, 2008, a f t e r had affirmed, 30, 2006, judgment, w h i c h had Ala. Immediate without R. an Civ. P., this affirmance." C o u r t on opinion, the and Boles proceeding with outcome the trial f o r damages a g a i n s t due t o be s e t down d u r i n g on p e n d i n g and BI and (Emphasis Boles's trial court foreclosure added.) motion court's filed Foreclosure" that any Kennedy's F e b r u a r y 15, trial requesting term." against 2008, January b e e n made f i n a l p u r s u a n t t o BI Injunction Against the first injunction 12. April 54(b), the The i n the "enjoin at trial and issued the 28, 2008, the this the a Rule "Motion for trial court [Kennedy] time from pending the [Kennedy] c u r r e n t l y first court available jury summarily i n j u n c t i o n on granted April 29, 2008. On October trial on court issued 27 and a l l pending an claims. order On disposing 2 trial court N o v e m b e r 3, of held 2008, a l l pending a bench the trial claims and 1080607 "award[ing] a $3,650,000.00 2008, the plus judgment against costs ruled November the 3, 2 0 0 8 , The of B e c a u s e t h e November 3, 2008 issues injunction against 2008 does not Kennedy, injunction. render the nonfinal. raised by Kennedy submission, the having been application i s overruled. APPLICATION Cobb, amount d i s s o l v e d the A p r i l c o n s i d e r e d on o r i g i n a l rehearing i n the the counterclaims judgment remaining thoroughly Murdock, April [Kennedy] of c o u r t . " upon judgment e f f e c t i v e l y Therefore, for judgment OVERRULED. C . J . , and Lyons, Woodall, a n d Shaw, J J . , c o n c u r . 3 Stuart, Bolin, Parker,
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
