IN RE WILSON N. JONES MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, RAMONA HENSON, R.N., AND SHELLY SELF, L.V.N. (other)

Annotate this Case
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

============

No. 03-0867

============

In re Wilson N. Jones Memorial Hospital, Ramona Henson, R.N., And Shelly Self, L.V.N., Relators

====================================================

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

====================================================

PER CURIAM

The issue in this original proceeding is whether section 15.007 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code authorizes a statutory probate court to transfer a wrongful death and survival case to itself under section 5B of the Probate Code when venue would be improper under chapter 15 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code in the county in which the probate court is located and a party objects. In our opinions issued today in Gonzalez v. Reliant Energy, Inc.[1] and In re Reliant Energy, Inc.,[2] we answered this question in the negative. We therefore hold in this case that the Travis County probate court erroneously transferred a wrongful death and survival action from a Grayson County district court to itself pursuant to section 5B of the Probate Code.[3] Venue was not proper in Travis County under chapter 15 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code.[4]

Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.8(c), we issue this opinion without hearing oral argument[5] and conditionally grant mandamus relief directing the Travis County probate court to vacate its order granting the motion to transfer. Our writ will issue only if the probate court fails to act in accordance with this opinion.

OPINION DELIVERED: March 11, 2005


[1] ___ S.W.3d ___ (Tex. 2005).

[2] ___ S.W.3d ___ (Tex. 2005).

[3] Act of May 20, 1999, 76th Leg., R.S., ch. 1431, ' 1, 1999 Tex. Gen. Laws 4876, 4876 (amended 2003) (current version at Tex. Prob. Code ' 5B).

[4] Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code 15.002.

[5] Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(c).

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.