HUKILL v. THARP

HUKILL v. THARP
1912 OK 728
128 P. 113
36 Okla. 178
Case Number: 2247
Decided: 11/19/1912
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

HUKILL et al.
v.
THARP et al.

Syllabus

¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR -- Dismissal -- Failure to File Briefs. Where plaintiffs in error file no brief, as required by rule 7 (20 Okla. viii, 95 P. vi) of this court, the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution.

Dick Rice, for plaintiffs in error.
F. D. Fulkerson, for defendants in error.

SHARP, C.

¶1 The petition in error and case made was filed in this court January 9, 1911. Plaintiffs in error have filed no brief; nor have they asked for an extension of time in which to prepare and file brief. It will therefore be considered that the appeal has been abandoned; and the petition in error should therefore be dismissed for want of prosecution. Cox v. Rogers, 30 Okla. 296, 119 P. 205; Rice et al. v. Jones et al., 32 Okla. 734, 124 P. 67; Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Rath, 32 Okla. 857, 124 P. 59.

¶2 By the Court: It is so ordered.