RICE v. JONES

Annotate this Case

RICE v. JONES
1912 OK 404
124 P. 67
32 Okla. 734
Case Number: 1539
Decided: 05/14/1912
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

RICE et al.
v.
JONES et al.

Syllabus

¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR--Dismissal--Failure to File Brief. Where plaintiff in error files no brief, as required by rule 7 (20 Okla. viii, 95 P. vi) of this court the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution.

Rennie, Hocker & Moore, for plaintiffs in error.
J. F. Sharp, for defendants in error.

ROSSER, C.


¶1 The petition in error and transcript of the record was filed in this court March 9, 1910. Plaintiffs in error have failed to file brief in the case. Petition in error should, therefore, be dismissed for want of prosecution. Hass v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290, 111 P. 543; Maddin v. McCormick, 27 Okla. 779, 117 P. 200; McClelland v. Witherall, 30 Okla. 287, 119 P. 205; Cox v. Rogers, 30 Okla. 296, 119 P. 205; Bender v. Bender, 30 Okla. 288, 119 P. 205.

¶2 By the Court: It is so ordered.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.