Interest of P.R.-K.

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT SEPTEMBER 28, 2023 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2023 ND 184 In the Interest of P.R.-K., minor child State of North Dakota, Petitioner and Appellee v. P.R.-K., child; P.R.-K., father; Respondents and C.B., mother, Respondent and Appellant No. 20230281 In the Interest of K.R.-K., minor child State of North Dakota, Petitioner and Appellee v. K.R.-K., child; P.R.-K., father; Respondents and C.B., mother, Respondent and Appellant No. 20230282 Appeal from the Juvenile Court of Ward County, North Central Judicial District, the Honorable Kelly A. Dillon, Judicial Referee. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Rozanna C. Larson, State’s Attorney, Minot, ND, for petitioner and appellee. Kiara C. Kraus-Parr, Grand Forks, ND, for respondent and appellant. Interest of P.R.-K. and K.R.-K. Nos. 20230281 & 20230282 Per Curiam. [¶1] C.B. appeals from the juvenile court’s order terminating parental rights to her two minor children, P.R.-K. and K.R.-K. C.B. argues the court erred in finding conditions and causes of deprivation are likely to continue. C.B. also argues the court erred in finding the children will suffer physical, mental, moral or emotional harm without termination. The record supports the court’s findings by clear and convincing evidence that a child tested positive for THC and methamphetamine, and C.B. continued using methamphetamine, was homeless, lacked employment, and had suicidal tendencies. Those findings are not clearly erroneous. [¶2] The juvenile court found the children spent over 450 of the last 660 nights in the care, control, and custody of the human service zone and are in need of protection. The record supports the court’s findings, and they are not clearly erroneous. Based on the findings, the court did not abuse its discretion terminating C.B.’s parental rights. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). [¶3] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte Douglas A. Bahr 1

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.