Interest of S.A.

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OCTOBER 28, 2021 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2021 ND 197 In the Interest of S.A., a child Jacqueline A. Gaddie, Assistant States Attorney, Petitioner and Appellee v. K.A., mother, Respondent and Appellant and S.A., a child, and M.R.K., father, Emily Crothers, Guardian ad Litem, Respondents No. 20210061 In the Interest of H.A., a child Jacqueline A. Gaddie, Assistant States Attorney, Petitioner and Appellee v. K.A., mother, Respondent and Appellant and H.A., a child, and J.G., father, Emily Crothers, Guardian ad Litem, Respondents No. 20210062 Appeals from the Juvenile Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Central Judicial District, the Honorable M. Jason McCarthy, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Jacqueline A. Gaddie, Assistant State’s Attorney, Grand Forks, N.D., for petitioner and appellee; submitted on brief. Laura C. Ringsak, Bismarck, N.D., for respondent and appellant; submitted on brief. Interest of S.A. & H.A. Nos. 20210061 & 20210062 Per Curiam. [¶1] K.A. appeals from an order entered by the juvenile court determining her children, S.A. and H.A., to be deprived under N.D.C.C. § 27-20-02(8) (now N.D.C.C. § 27-20.3-01(5)(a)). The juvenile court ordered the children be removed from K.A.’s home and placed under the care, custody, and control of the Director of the Grand Forks County Human Services Zone for appropriate placement for 12 months. On appeal, K.A. argues the juvenile court erred by finding the children to be deprived. We conclude the juvenile court’s findings are supported by clear and convincing evidence and are not clearly erroneous. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). [¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte Allan L. Schmalenberger, S.J. [¶3] The Honorable Allan L. Schmalenberger, Surrogate Judge, sitting in place of Crothers, J. disqualified. 1

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.