Interest of P.T.D., C.R.D., P.A.D., P.P.D., & N.A.D.
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: 3 An appeal from a juvenile court order finding five children to be deprived is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2019 ND 3
In the Interest of P.T.D., a child
State of North Dakota, Petitioner and Appellee
v.
P.T.D., child, and T.P.D., father, Respondents
and
A.R.D., mother, Respondent and Appellant
No. 20180192
In the Interest of C.R.D., a child
State of North Dakota, Petitioner and Appellee
v.
C.R.D., child, and T.P.D., father, Respondents
and
A.R.D., mother, Respondent and Appellant
No. 20180193
In the Interest of P.A.D., a child
State of North Dakota, Petitioner and Appellee
v.
P.A.D., child, and T.P.D., father, Respondents
and
A.R.D., mother, Respondent and Appellant
No. 20180194
In the Interest of P.P.D., a child
State of North Dakota, Petitioner and Appellee v. P.P.D., child, and T.P.D., father, Respondents
and
A.R.D., mother, Respondent and Appellant
No. 20180195
In the Interest of N.A.D., a child
State of North Dakota, Petitioner and Appellee v. N.A.D., child, and T.P.D., father, Respondents and A.R.D., mother, Respondent and Appellant
No. 20180196
Appeal from the Juvenile Court of Stutsman County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Jay A. Schmitz, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Frederick R. Fremgen, State's Attorney, Jamestown, ND, for petitioner and appellee.
Kiara Kraus-Parr, Grand Forks, ND, for respondent and appellant.
Interest of P.T.D., C.R.D., P.A.D., P.P.D., and N.A.D.Nos. 20180192-20180196
Per Curiam.
[¶1] A.D. appeals from a juvenile court order finding her five children to be deprived. On appeal, A.D. argues the juvenile court erred by finding the children to be deprived because the unsanitary and dangerous household has been cured by a move to a new home, any drug issues are now under control, there was no evidence she used drugs around the children, and the record does not contain any evidence her actions have negatively affected the children. We conclude the juvenile court's findings are not clearly erroneous. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Jon J. Jensen
Lisa Fair McEvers
Daniel J. Crothers
Jerod E. Tufte
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
