Harmon v. State

Annotate this Case

Court Description: Order denying post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6).



IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2016 ND 203

Carl Aubury Harmon, III, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20160101

Appeal from the District Court of Williams County, Northwest Judicial District, the Honorable Paul W. Jacobson, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Russell J. Myhre, P.O. Box 475, Valley City, N.D. 58072, for petitioner and appellant; on brief.
Nathan K. Madden, Assistant State's Attorney, P.O. Box 2047, Williston, N.D. 58802, for respondent and appellee; on brief.

Harmon v. StateNo. 20160101

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Carl Harmon appeals from a district court order denying his applications for post-conviction relief. In 1996, Harmon was convicted of gross sexual imposition, felonious restraint, and terrorizing, and his conviction was affirmed on appeal. State v. Harmon, 1997 ND 233, 575 N.W.2d 635. Harmon filed two prior post-conviction relief applications, which were denied. One was appealed and affirmed. See Harmon v. State, 2012 ND 83, 816 N.W.2d 812. In 2014 and 2015, Harmon applied for post-conviction relief. The State moved to summarily dismiss the applications, and the district court granted the State's motion. On appeal, Harmon argues his attorney abandoned him by failing to respond to the State's motion to dismiss and he should be allowed to apply for relief from the court's order under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(1). We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Carol Ronning Kapsner

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.