Greybear v. State

Annotate this Case

Court Description: District court judgment denying post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).



IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2014 ND 218

Lyndon Galen Greybear, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20140137

Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Douglas R. Herman, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Lee M. Grossman, 341 Central Avenue North, Suite 3, P.O. Box 475, Valley City, N.D. 58072, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.
Leah J. Viste, Assistant State's Attorney, Courthouse, P.O. Box 2806, Fargo, N.D. 58108-2806, for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief.

Greybear v. StateNo. 20140137

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Lyndon Greybear appeals a district court judgment denying his application for post-conviction relief. Greybear claims he is entitled to post-conviction relief because he received ineffective assistance of counsel and the State engaged in prosecutorial misconduct. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), concluding the district court did not err in dismissing Greybear's application for post-conviction relief, after an evidentiary hearing.

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Carol Ronning Kapsner

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.