Luger v. State

Annotate this Case

Court Description: A district court order denying application for postconviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).



IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2014 ND 214

Chad Lee Luger, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20140106

Appeal from the District Court of Morton County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Sonna M. Anderson, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Mark T. Blumer, P.O. Box 7340, Fargo, ND 58106, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.
Allen M. Koppy, State's Attorney, 210 2nd Avenue NW, Mandan, ND 58554, for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief.

Luger v. StateNo. 20140106

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Chad Lee Luger appeals a district court order denying his petition for postconviction relief after pleading guilty to interference with a telephone during an emergency call and aggravated assault. Luger argued the district court erred in denying his petition after an evidentiary hearing because he was denied effective assistance of counsel, and the outcome would have been different had his attorney not failed to depose a witness or not advised him that he would receive a maximum sentence if he were to take the matter to trial. We conclude the district court did not err in determining Luger failed to establish ineffective assistance of counsel. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Lisa Fair McEvers
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.