Palmer v. State

Annotate this Case

Court Description: District court order summarily dismissing application for post-conviction relief summarily affirmed under N.D.R.Civ.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (6).



IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2014 ND 78

Mark Christian Palmer, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20140002

Appeal from the District Court of McHenry County, Northeast Judicial District, the Honorable Michael G. Sturdevant, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Russell J. Myhre, P.O. Box 475, Valley City, N.D. 58072, for petitioner and appellant.
Cassey A. Breyer, State's Attorney, 407 Main Street South, Room 307, Towner, N.D. 58788, for respondent and appellee.

Palmer v. StateNo. 20140002

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Mark Palmer appeals from a district court order summarily denying his second application for post-conviction relief. This Court previously affirmed Palmer's conviction of four counts of gross sexual imposition. State v. Palmer, 2002 ND 5, 638 N.W.2d 18. This Court also affirmed a district court order denying his N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for relief from an order denying his application for post-conviction relief, after initially remanding to the district court to sufficiently explain the rationale for its decision. See Palmer v. State, 2012 ND 237, 824 N.W.2d 406; Palmer v. State, 2012 ND 98, 816 N.W.2d 807.

[¶2] On appeal, Palmer argues the district court abused its discretion in denying his post-conviction relief application when he has never been afforded an opportunity for a hearing to establish whether his trial attorney provided ineffective assistance of counsel and his first post-conviction counsel ineffectively represented him by missing a deadline which resulted in a dismissal of his initial post-conviction relief application. Palmer also raises supplemental issues regarding due process and double jeopardy. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (6).

[¶3] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Carol Ronning Kapsner

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.