Winarske v. State

Annotate this Case

Court Description: Order denying application for post-conviction relief summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).



IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2014 ND 117

Adam Joseph Winarske, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota , Respondent and Appellee

No. 20130390

Appeal from the District Court of Morton County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable David E. Reich, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Erin M. Conroy (on brief), 416 Sinclair Street, P.O. Box 137, Bottineau, N.D. 58318, and Nicholas D. Thornton (on brief), 3003 32nd Avenue South, Suite 240, P.O. Box 3143, Fargo, N.D. 58108-3143, for petitioner and appellant.
Allen M. Koppy (on brief), Morton County State's Attorney, 210 Second Avenue NW, Mandan, N.D. 58554, for respondent and appellee.

Winarske v. StateNo. 20130390

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Adam Winarske appeals from a district court order denying his application for post-conviction relief. Winarske argues he received ineffective assistance of counsel because his attorney failed to object to the presentation of certain testimony and failed to cross-examine a witness. He also argues his counsel was ineffective because his attorney allegedly failed to appropriately research and calculate his credit for time served. The district court found there is no evidence in this case to support Winarske's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Carol Ronning Kapsner

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.