Sateren v. Sateren

Annotate this Case

Court Description: District court order explaining and reaffirming an earlier order denying reallocation of marital property and debt in a divorce case is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).



IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2013 ND 209

Lorne C. Sateren, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Marilyn L. Sateren, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20130220

Appeal from the District Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Central Judicial District, the Honorable Joel D. Medd, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Patti Jo Jensen, P.O. Box 386, East Grand Forks, Minn. 56721-0386, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.
Jacey L. Johnston, 221 South 4th Street, Grand Forks, N.D. 58201, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.

Sateren v. SaterenNo. 20130220

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Marilyn Sateren appeals from a district court order entered after our remand in Sateren v. Sateren, 2013 ND 12, ¶ 1, 826 N.W.2d 303, explaining and reaffirming an earlier order denying reallocation of marital property and debt in a divorce case. Because the court's findings of fact are not clearly erroneous and the court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to grant her request for N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b) relief from the divorce judgment, we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Mary Muehlen Maring
Carol Ronning Kapsner

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.