Interest of N.R., a Child

In the Interest of N.R., a Child

Phyllis Gaspers, L.S.W., Petitioner and Appellee
v.
S.R., Mother and N.R., Father, Respondents and Appellants

No. 20130212

In the Interest of D.R., a Child

Phyllis Gaspers, L.S.W., Petitioner and Appellee
v.
S.R., Mother and N.R., Father, Respondents and Appellants

No. 20130213

In the Interest of S.C., a Child

Phyllis Gaspers, L.S.W., Petitioner and Appellee
v.
S.R., Mother and C.C., Father, Respondents S.R., Mother Appellant

No. 20130218

Appeals from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Frank L. Racek, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Pam H. Ormand, P.O. Box 3106, Fargo, N.D. 58108-3106, for petitioner and appellee.
Daniel A. Gulya (argued) and Gene W. Doeling Jr. (on brief), P.O. Box 423, Fargo, N.D. 58107-0423, for respondent and appellant N.R.
Douglas W. Nesheim, 15 9th Street South, Fargo, N.D. 58103-1830, for respondent and appellant S.R.

Interest of N.R., D.R., S.C.Nos. 20130212, 20130213 & 20130218

Per Curiam.

[¶1] S.R., the mother of S.C., N.R., and D.R., and N.R., the father of N.R. and D.R., appealed from a juvenile court order finding the children are deprived and terminating S.R. and N.R.'s parental rights. N.R. argued the court erred in finding that N.R. and D.R. were deprived and that the deprivation was likely to continue. S.R. argued the district court erred in finding the deprivation of the children was likely to continue and the children would likely suffer harm absent termination of parental rights. We conclude the court's findings are supported by clear and convincing evidence and are not clearly erroneous, and we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Mary Muehlen Maring
Carol Ronning Kapsner