Gray v. State

Annotate this Case

Court Description: A district court order denying postconviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).



IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2013 ND 87

Robert Gray, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20130064

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Thomas J. Schneider, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Adam Lawrence Fleischman (argued) and Blake Dylan Hankey (on brief), 405 Bruce Avenue, Suite 100, Grand Forks, ND 58201, for petitioner and appellant.
Lloyd Clayton Suhr, Assistant State's Attorney, Courthouse, 514 East Thayer Avenue, Bismarck, ND 58501, for respondent and appellee.

Gray v. StateNo. 20130064

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Robert A. Gray appeals a district court order denying his application for postconviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Gray argues he received ineffective assistance of counsel, he should be allowed to withdraw his guilty plea to correct a manifest injustice and the prosecution failed to provide exculpatory evidence. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Mary Muehlen Maring

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.