Ennen v. State

Annotate this Case

Court Description: An appeal from an order denying an application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).



IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2013 ND 66

John Karl Ennen, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20120408

Appeal from the District Court of Morton County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Cynthia Feland, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Kent M. Morrow, P.O. Box 2155, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-2155, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.
Jackson J. Lofgren, Assistant State's Attorney, 210 2nd Avenue NW, Mandan, N.D. 58554, for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief.

Ennen v. StateNo. 20120408

Per Curiam.

[¶1] John Ennen appeals from an order denying his application for post-conviction relief. After an evidentiary hearing, the district court decided Ennen did not receive ineffective assistance of trial counsel in proceedings culminating with this Court's summary affirmance of his conviction for surreptitious intrusion. See State v. Ennen, 2011 ND 130, ¶ 1, 803 N.W.2d 834. We conclude the district court did not err in deciding Ennen did not receive ineffective assistance of trial counsel, and we affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Mary Muehlen Maring
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom
Carol Ronning Kapsner

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.