State v. Bentz
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Criminal judgment for terrorizing is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2013 ND 43
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Rustin Dale Bentz, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20120345
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable David E. Reich, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Jeffrey R. Ubben, Assistant State's Attorney, Courthouse, 514 East Thayer Avenue, Bismarck, ND 58501, for plaintiff and appellee.
Thomas M. Tuntland, 210 Collins Avenue, P.O. Box 1315, Mandan, ND 58554-1315, for defendant and appellant.
State v. BentzNo. 20120345
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Rustin Bentz appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of being a felon in possession of a firearm, terrorizing, and carrying a loaded firearm in a vehicle. On appeal, he argues the trial evidence was insufficient to support his terrorizing conviction. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Mary Muehlen Maring
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.