State v. Anaya-Verajerano
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Criminal judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding defendant guilty of conspiracy to commit burglary and conspiracy to commit theft is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2012 ND 210
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Jose Angel Anaya-Verajerano, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20120268
Appeal from the District Court of Bowman County, Southwest Judicial District, the Honorable Harlan Patrick Weir, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
James D. Gion, State's Attorney, P.O. Box 101, Regent, N.D. 58650-0101, for plaintiff and appellee; on brief.
Jay R. Greenwood, 135 Sims, Suite 221, Dickinson, N.D. 58601, for defendant and appellant; on brief.
State v. Anaya-VerajeranoNo. 20120268
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Jose Anaya-Verajerano appealed from a criminal judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of conspiracy to commit burglary and conspiracy to commit theft. Anaya-Verajerano contends there was insufficient evidence for the jury to find that there was a conspiracy to commit burglary or theft. We affirm the judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Mary Muehlen Maring
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.