Interest of D.V.A.

Annotate this Case

Filed Oct. 19, 2010
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2010 ND 192

In the Interest of D.V.A. Cynthia M. Feland, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
D.V.A., Respondent and Appellant

No. 20100091

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Bruce A. Romanick, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Cynthia Mae Feland (appeared), Assistant State's Attorney, and Jordan J. Evert (argued), third-year law student, under the Rule on Limited Practice of Law by Law Students, 514 East Thayer Avenue, Bismarck, N.D. 58501-4413, for plaintiff and appellee.
Kent M. Morrow, P.O. Box 2155, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-2155, for respondent and appellant.

Interest of D.V.A.No. 20100091

Per Curiam.

[1] D.V.A. appeals from a district court order continuing his commitment as a sexually dangerous individual. See In the Matter of D.V.A., 2009 ND 75, 764 N.W.2d 417; In the Interest of D.V.A., 2004 ND 57, 676 N.W.2d 776. He argues the district court's order violated his right to the least restrictive available treatment program or facility under N.D.C.C. 25-03.3-13 and the court erred when it failed to consider any least restrictive treatment programs for him. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7) and In the Interest of P.F., 2008 ND 37, 744 N.W.2d 724.

[2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Mary Muehlen Maring
Carol Ronning Kapsner

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.