Knodel v. Knodel
Annotate this CaseFiled Nov. 18, 2003
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2003 ND 176
Elmer Knodel, Plaintiff and Appellant
v.
Caryl Knodel, Defendant and Appellee
No. 20030143
Appeal from the District Court of Sheridan County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Gail H. Hagerty, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Maury C. Thompson, P.O. Box 1771, Bismarck, ND 58502-1771, for plaintiff and appellant.
Susan L. Ellison, Ellison Law Office, PC, P.O. Box 9097, Fargo, ND 58106-9097, for defendant and appellee.
Knodel v. Knodel
No. 20030143
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Elmer Knodel appealed from a judgment of divorce. He contends the trial court's division of the marital debt and property was clearly erroneous because he brought most of the property into the marriage, the division will destroy or damage his ability to earn a livelihood and significantly diminish the value of the property, and it was inequitable. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Mary Muehlen Maring
William A. Neumann
Cynthia Rothe-Seeger, D.J.
[¶3] The Honorable Cynthia Rothe-Seeger, D. J., sitting in place of Sandstrom, J., disqualified.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.