City of Bismarck v. Stockert

Annotate this Case

[Go to Documents]Filed Apr. 15, 2003[Download as WordPerfect]IN THE SUPREME COURTSTATE OF NORTH DAKOTA2003 ND 57

City of Bismarck, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Jeffrey L. Stockert, Defendant and Appellant

Nos. 20020331 - 20020333

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Burt L. Riskedahl, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
William D. Schmidt, P.O. Box 2076, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-2076, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.
Paul H. Fraase, Assistant City Attorney, P.O. Box 5503, Bismarck, N.D. 58506-5503, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.

City of Bismarck v. Stockert
Nos. 20020331-20020333

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Jeffrey L. Stockert appeals a jury's verdict convicting him of criminal mischief, disorderly conduct, and unlawful registration of a motor vehicle. Stockert argues another person committed the crimes charged, and the State presented insufficient evidence to convict him. "We will reverse a criminal conviction only if, after viewing the evidence and all evidentiary inferences favorable to the prosecution, no rational fact finder could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt." City of Jamestown v. Tahran, 2003 ND 35, ¶ 4, 657 N.W.2d 235. Because a rational jury could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt based on the evidence presented, we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
William A. Neumann
Dale V. Sandstrom
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Mary Muehlen Maring

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.