T.S. v. J.L.

Annotate this Case

T. S. v. J. L., 562 N.W.2d 104 (N.D. 1996)

[Go to Documents]Filed Nov. 13, 1996IN THE SUPREME COURTSTATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

T.S. and Katherine Anagnost as guardian ad litem for L.A.S., Plaintiffs and Appellees
v.
J.L., Defendant and Appellant

Civil No. 960151

Appeal from the District Court for Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Bruce B. Haskell, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
William D. Schmidt, of Schmitz, Moench & Schmidt, P.O. Box 2076, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-2076, for defendant and appellant.
Rauleigh D. Robinson, P.O. Box 1221, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-1221, for plaintiffs and appellees.
Sheila K. Keller, Regional Child Support Enforcement Unit, P.O. Box 5518, Bismarck, N.D. 58502.

T.S., et al. v. J.L.

Civil No. 960151

Per Curiam.

J.L. appeals the district court's judgment delineating his child support obligation. Specifically, J.L. argues the district court erred by finding no existing stipulation in the child support obligations; by ordering child support payments in arrears based on J.L.'s 1992 and 1994 income; and by giving insufficient weight to J.L.'s temporary employment situation and indefinite plan to return to school in determining his future child support obligation. We affirm the district court's judgment under Rule 35.1(a)(2), N.D.R.App.P.

Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
William A. Neumann
Herbert L. Meschke
Dale V. Sandstrom
Mary Muehlen Maring

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.