City of Bismarck v. Feist

City of Bismarck v. Feist, 551 N.W.2d 567 (N.D. 1996)

[Go to Documents]Filed Apr. 23, 1996IN THE SUPREME COURTSTATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

City of Bismarck, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Greg J. Feist, Defendant and Appellant

Criminal No. 950419

Appeal from the District Court for Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Benny A. Graff, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Ralph A. Vinje, Vinje Law Firm, 523 North 4th Street, Bismarck, N.D. 58501, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.
Paul H. Fraase, City Prosecutor, P.O. Box 5503, Bismarck, N.D. 58506-5503, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.

City of Bismarck v. FeistCriminal No. 950419

Per Curiam.

Greg J. Feist appeals his conviction for driving under the influence, apparently arguing a criminal conviction subsequent to an administrative driver's license suspension violates double jeopardy. We affirm under Rule 35.1(a)(7), N.D.R.App.P. State v. Jacobson, (Criminal Nos. 950259 & 950302; Filed 3/15/96) N.W.2d (N.D. 1996) (addressing state constitutional law argument); State v. Zimmerman, 539 N.W.2d 49 (N.D. 1995) (addressing federal constitutional law argument).

Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
William A. Neumann
Mary Muehlen Maring
Dale V. Sandstrom
Herbert L. Meschke