City of Bismarck v. DeCoteau
Annotate this CaseCity of Bismarck v. DeCoteau, 544 N.W.2d 176 (N.D. 1996)
[Go to Documents]Filed Jan. 3, 1996IN THE SUPREME COURTSTATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
City of Bismarck, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Randy Earl DeCoteau, Defendant and Appellant
Criminal No. 950157
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Burt L. Riskedahl, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Paul H. Fraase, Assistant City Attorney, P.O. Box 5503, Bismarck, ND 58502-5503, for plaintiff and appellee. Submitted on briefs.
William D. Schmidt, Schmitz, Moench & Schmidt, 116 N. 4th Street, Suite 200, P.O. Box 2076, Bismarck, ND 58502-2076, for defendant and appellant. Submitted on briefs.
City of Bismarck v. DeCoteauCriminal No. 950157
Per Curiam.
Randy Earl DeCoteau appealed from the judgment of conviction entered upon the jury verdict of guilty of driving under suspension in violation of section 12-10-06 of the Bismarck Code of Ordinances. DeCoteau argues that he did not have actual notice of the suspension orders issued to him.
We affirm under N.D.R. App. P. 35.1(a)(3), (4), and (7). See N.D. Cent. Code 39-06-43; State v. Tininenko, 371 N.W.2d 762 (N.D. 1985); State v. Knittel, 308 N.W.2d 379 (N.D. 1981).
Gerald W. VandeWalle, C. J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
Herbert L. Meschke
Beryl J. Levine
William A. Neumann
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.