Krise v. Krise

Annotate this Case

Krise v. Krise, 544 N.W.2d 176 (N.D. 1996)

[Go to Documents]Filed Jan. 11, 1996IN THE SUPREME COURTSTATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

James Nelson Krise, Plaintiff and Appellant
v.
Gail Lee Krise, Defendant and Appellee

Civil No. 950108

Appeal from the District Court for Williams County, Northwest Judicial District, the Honorable Gerald H. Rustad, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Janet H. Zander of Zander Law Office, P.C., Williston, for plaintiff and appellant.
Judith E. Howard of Howard Law Firm, Minot, for defendant and appellee.

Krise v. Krise
Civil No. 950108

Per Curiam.

James Krise appealed from a district court divorce judgment dividing the marital property and awarding spousal support to Gail Krise. James asserts that the trial court abused its discretion in allowing an amendment to the pleadings and challenges the findings of fact on property division and spousal support.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 35.1(a)(2) and (4), N.D.R.App.P. We deny Gail's request for attorney's fees on appeal.

Gerald W. VandeWalle, C. J.
Herbert L. Meschke
Dale V. Sandstrom
Beryl J. Levine
William A. Neumann

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.