Matter of White v Annucci

Annotate this Case
Matter of White v Annucci 2017 NY Slip Op 08067 Decided on November 16, 2017 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: November 16, 2017
524311

[*1]In the Matter of JOHN WHITE, Petitioner,

v

ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, et al., Respondents.

Calendar Date: September 19, 2017
Before: Garry, J.P., Egan Jr., Devine, Clark and Rumsey, JJ.

John White, Pine City, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondents.



MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision finding petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a tier III disciplinary determination finding him guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. Accordingly, as petitioner has received all of the relief to

which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Slide v Russo, 151 AD3d 1518, 1518 [2017]; Matter of Whitlock v Kirkpatrick, 149 AD3d 1448, 1448 [2017]).

Garry, J.P., Egan Jr., Devine, Clark and Rumsey, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs, but with disbursements in the amount of $15.



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.