Matter of Dumas v Olcott
Annotate this CaseDecided and Entered: May 18, 2017
523552
[*1]In the Matter of DANIEL DUMAS, Petitioner,
v
A. OLCOTT, as Correction Officer at Woodbourne Correctional Facility, Respondent.
Calendar Date: April 4, 2017
Before: McCarthy, J.P., Lynch, Rose, Devine and Aarons, JJ.
Daniel Dumas, Woodbourne, petitioner pro se.
Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (William E. Storrs of counsel), for respondent.
MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Sullivan County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision finding petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Determination confirmed. No opinion.
McCarthy, J.P., Lynch, Rose, Devine and Aarons, JJ., concur.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.