Matter of Gega v Annucci

Annotate this Case
Matter of Gega v Annucci 2017 NY Slip Op 03239 Decided on April 27, 2017 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: April 27, 2017
523419

[*1]In the Matter of EDMIR GEGA, Petitioner,

v

ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

Calendar Date: February 28, 2017
Before: McCarthy, J.P., Garry, Lynch, Devine and Mulvey, JJ.

Edmir Gega, Attica, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.



MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating numerous prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has since been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the $5 mandatory surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. Although petitioner requests reinstatement of privileges, he is not entitled to be restored to the status that he enjoyed prior to the disciplinary determination (see Matter of

West v Annucci, 134 AD3d 1379, 1380 [2015]). However, the loss of good time that was imposed as part of the penalty should be restored to petitioner (see Matter of Garnes v Annucci, 144 AD3d 1277, 1277 [2016]). Otherwise, given that petitioner has been granted all of the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Simmons v Kirkpatrick, 142 AD3d 1245, 1245 [2016]).

McCarthy, J.P., Garry, Lynch, Devine and Mulvey, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.