People v Moore

Annotate this Case
People v Moore 2017 NY Slip Op 06001 Decided on August 3, 2017 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: August 3, 2017
107612

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,

v

SARA MOORE, Appellant.

Calendar Date: June 12, 2017
Before: McCarthy, J.P., Garry, Clark, Mulvey and Aarons, JJ.

G. Scott Walling, Schenectady, for appellant, and appellant pro se.

P. David Soares, District Attorney, Albany (Christopher D. Horn of counsel), for respondent.



MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Herrick, J.), rendered October 15, 2014, convicting defendant upon her plea of guilty of the crime of murder in the second degree.

Defendant was charged in a four-count indictment with murder in the first degree, murder in the second degree (two counts) and robbery in the first degree stemming from the death of Richard Englander in his home in February 2014. Pursuant to a plea agreement that satisfied all charges, defendant pleaded guilty under count 3 of the indictment to murder in the second degree, admitting that she had intentionally killed Englander by hitting him in the head with a tire iron and cutting his throat with a knife while she was employed as his caretaker. As part of the agreement, defendant waived her right to appeal and signed a

written waiver of appeal in open court. County Court thereafter imposed the agreed-upon prison term of 25 years to life. Defendant now appeals.

Appellate counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment of representing defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues to be raised on appeal. Based upon our review of the record, counsel's brief and defendant's pro se letter to the Court, we agree. Therefore, the judgment is affirmed and counsel's request for leave to withdraw is granted (see People v Cruwys , 113 AD2d 979, 980 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]; see generally People v Stokes , 95 NY2d 633 [2001]).

McCarthy, J.P., Garry, Clark, Mulvey and Aarons, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.