Matter of Willette (Commissioner of Labor)

Annotate this Case
Matter of Willette (Commissioner of Labor) 2015 NY Slip Op 03023 Decided on April 9, 2015 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: April 9, 2015
519753

[*1] JILL WILLETTE, Respondent. PARK RIDE FLY USA, Appellant.

and

COMMISSIONER OF LABOR, Respondent.

Calendar Date: February 24, 2015
Before: Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Rose and Devine, JJ.

Tabner, Ryan & Keniry, LLP, Albany (Brian M. Quinn of counsel), for appellant.

Cynthia Feathers, Glens Falls, for Jill Willette, respondent.



MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Appeals from two decisions of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 13, 2013, which ruled, among other things, that Park Ride Fly USA was liable for unemployment insurance contributions based on remuneration paid to claimant and others similarly situated.

Substantial evidence supports the decisions of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant and others similarly situated were the employees of Park Ride Fly USA. Park Ride operates a website where individuals can reserve parking near airports across the United States, and claimant worked for it as a customer service agent. Claimant was required to answer telephone calls from customers, which were routed to her home

using specialized equipment that Park Ride provided. She received several weeks of training to perform that work, and thereafter worked hours selected by her and approved by her supervisor. Customer complaints were handled by Park Ride, and supervisors monitored calls in order to ensure quality control. Claimant was further required to detail the hours she worked, was paid a set amount per hour on a weekly basis, and was reimbursed for expenses. Notwithstanding contrary evidence in the record, the Board could readily find from the foregoing that Park Ride "exercised sufficient direction and control over the services performed by claimant and other persons similarly situated to establish their status as employees" (Matter of Noblitt [Oxford Univ. Press—Hudacs], 193 AD2d 1033, 1033 [1993]; see Matter of Noel [Life Alert Emergency Response, Inc.—Commissioner of Labor], 38 AD3d 1082, 1083-1084 [2007]; Matter of Frattallone [Victor Addressing Corp.—Levine], 39 AD2d 984, 984 [1972]).

Park Ride's remaining argument has been considered and found to be lacking in merit.

Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Rose and Devine, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the decisions are affirmed, without costs.



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.