Matter of Stevens (Gannett Co. Inc.--Commissioner of Labor)

Annotate this Case
Matter of Stevens (Gannett Co. Inc.--Commissioner of Labor) 2015 NY Slip Op 06391 Decided on July 30, 2015 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: July 30, 2015
519643

[*1] ANDREW C. STEVENS, Respondent.

and

GANNETT COMPANY INC., Appellant. COMMISSIONER OF LABOR, Respondent. (Claim No. 1.)



In the Matter of the Claim of RYAN S. PLOUFFE, Respondent.

and

GANNETT COMPANY INC., Appellant. COMMISSIONER OF LABOR, Respondent. (Claim No. 2.)



In the Matter of the Claim of MICHELLE L. TOMPKINS, Respondent. GANNETT COMPANY INC., Appellant. COMMISSIONER OF LABOR, Respondent. (Claim No. 3.) In the Matter of the Claim of MAUDESTINE HART, Respondent. GANNETT COMPANY INC., Appellant. COMMISSIONER OF LABOR, Respondent. [*2](Claim No. 4.) In the Matter of the Claim of JASON A. CRAWFORD, Respondent. GANNETT COMPANY INC., Appellant. COMMISSIONER OF LABOR, Respondent. (Claim No. 5.) In the Matter of the Claim of CHRISTIAN P. WIEDEMANN, Respondent. GANNETT COMPANY INC., Appellant. COMMISSIONER OF LABOR, Respondent. (Claim No. 6.) In the Matter of the Claim of RHONDA M. LYNCH, Respondent. GANNETT COMPANY INC., Appellant. COMMISSIONER OF LABOR, Respondent. (Claim No. 7.)

Calendar Date: June 1, 2015
Before: Lahtinen, J.P., Lynch, Devine and Clark, JJ.

Bond Schoeneck & King, PLLC, Syracuse (Peter A. Jones of counsel) and The Zinser Law Firm, PC, Nashville, Tennessee (L. Michael Zinser admitted pro hac vice), for appellant.

James W. Cooper, Warrensburg, for Andrew C. Stevens and others, respondents.

Satterlee Stephens Burke & Burke, LLP, New York City (Mark A. Fowler of counsel), for New York News Publishers Association, amicus curiae.




Devine, J.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Appeals from 14 decisions of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 19, 2013, December 24, 2013, December 30, 2013, January 10, 2014 and January 14, 2014, which ruled, among other things, that Gannett Company Inc. is liable for additional unemployment insurance contributions on remuneration paid to claimants and others similarly situated.

The present appeals bear a striking similarity to prior ones in which we found substantial evidence to support decisions of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board holding that claimants who contracted with Gannett Company Inc. or Gannett Satellite Information Network, Inc. to deliver newspapers and other publications were employees of those entities (see Matter of Travis [Gannett Satellite Info. Network, Inc.—Commissioner of Labor], 127 AD3d 1349, 1349 [2015]; Matter of Gager [Gannett Satellite Info. Network, Inc.—Commissioner of Labor], 127 AD3d 1348, 1348-1349 [2015]; Matter of Hunter [Gannett Co., Inc.—Commissioner of Labor], 125 AD3d 1166, 1167-1168 [2015]; Matter of Armison [Gannett Co., Inc.—Commissioner of Labor], 122 AD3d 1101, 1102-1103 [2014], lv dismissed 24 NY3d 1209 [2015]). Suffice it to say, we perceive no factual distinctions that would warrant a different result in the appeals now before us. Gannett's remaining arguments have been examined and are wholly without merit.

Lahtinen, J.P., Lynch and Clark, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the decisions are affirmed, without costs.



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.