Matter of Clink v Cunningham
Annotate this CaseDecided and Entered: March 19, 2015
519367
[*1]In the Matter of CHARLES R. CLINK JR., Petitioner,
v
ROBERT F. CUNNINGHAM, as Superintendent of Woodbourne Correctional Facility, Respondent.
Calendar Date: January 20, 2015
Before: Lahtinen, J.P., Garry, Devine and Clark, JJ.
Charles R. Clink Jr., Woodbourne, petitioner pro se.
Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.
MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Sullivan County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Determination confirmed. No opinion.
Lahtinen, J.P., Garry, Devine and Clark, JJ., concur.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.