Matter of Tevault v Prack
Annotate this CaseDecided and Entered: April 23, 2015
519196
[*1]In the Matter of RICHARD TEVAULT, Petitioner,
v
ALBERT PRACK, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.
Calendar Date: February 24, 2015
Before: Garry, J.P., Rose, Devine and Clark, JJ.
Richard Tevault, Malone, petitioner pro se.
Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), respondent.
MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a tier III disciplinary hearing finding him guilty of violating various prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional disciplinary record, and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. In view of this, and given that petitioner has
received all of the relief to which he is entitled, the matter is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Ramos v Department of Corr. & Community Supervision, 123 AD3d 1215, 1215 [2014]).
Garry, J.P., Rose, Devine and Clark, JJ., concur.
ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.