Matter of Jones v Fischer

Annotate this Case
Matter of Jones v Fischer 2015 NY Slip Op 00936 Decided on February 5, 2015 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: February 5, 2015
518995

[*1]In the Matter of CLEMON JONES, Appellant,

v

BRIAN FISCHER, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, et al., Respondents.

Calendar Date: December 2, 2014
Before: Peters, P.J., Lahtinen, Egan Jr. and Lynch, JJ.

Clemon Jones, Attica, appellant pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondents.



MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Ferreira, J.), entered April 23, 2014 in Albany County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondents' motion to dismiss the petition.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating various prison disciplinary rules, claiming that he was denied the right to call witnesses. Respondents moved to dismiss the petition based upon petitioner's failure to exhaust his administrative remedies in that he did not raise that issue in his administrative appeal. Supreme Court granted the motion and this appeal ensued.

Because petitioner has failed to advance any arguments in his brief concerning the basis for Supreme Court's dismissal of the petition, any claims with regard thereto have been abandoned (see Matter of Wilson v Bezio, 93 AD3d 1053, 1053 [2012]; Matter of Gathers v Artus, 59 AD3d 795, 795 [2009]). As regards the issues he does raise, they are not properly before us.

Peters, P.J., Lahtinen, Egan Jr. and Lynch, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.