People ex rel.. Douglas v Apple

Annotate this Case
People ex rel.. Douglas v Apple 2015 NY Slip Op 09572 Decided on December 24, 2015 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: December 24, 2015
518913

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. KEITH DOUGLAS, Appellant,

v

CRAIG D. APPLE, as Sheriff of Albany County, Respondent.

Calendar Date: October 27, 2015
Before: Lahtinen, J.P., Egan Jr., Rose and Clark, JJ.

Keith Douglas, Comstock, appellant pro se.



MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Appeal from a decision of the Supreme Court (Lynch, J.), dated March 28, 2014 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, after a hearing.

Following his arrest on drug-related charges, petitioner commenced this habeas corpus proceeding seeking his immediate release. In view of petitioner being subsequently indicted, Supreme Court dismissed the proceeding as moot. This appeal ensued.

The decision of Supreme Court was never reduced to a judgment or order. "As a general rule, no appeal lies except from a judgment or an order" (People ex rel. Frazier v Fogg , 122 AD2d 377, 377 [1986]; see CPLR 5501). In any event, once petitioner was indicted, he was no longer entitled to the relief requested in his habeas corpus application (see People ex rel.

Miller v Knowlton , 239 AD2d 655, 655-656 [1997]; People ex rel. Warren v Davis , 92 AD2d 679, 679 [1983]).

Lahtinen, J.P., Egan Jr., Rose and Clark, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs.



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.