Matter of McDonald (Commissioner of Labor)

Annotate this Case
Matter of McDonald (Commissioner of Labor) 2015 NY Slip Op 05528 Decided on June 25, 2015 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: June 25, 2015
518886

[*1] IVORY M. McDONALD, Appellant.

and

COMMISSIONER OF LABOR, Respondent.

Calendar Date: May 5, 2015
Before: Peters, P.J., McCarthy, Egan Jr. and Lynch, JJ.

Ivory M. McDonald, New York City, appellant pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City (Bessie Bazile of counsel), for respondent.



MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 24, 2013, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which ruled that claimant lost her employment as a security officer due to disqualifying misconduct. The record establishes that claimant refused to patrol the six floors at the site where she was assigned because there was no elevator and she did not want to walk up the stairs. Although claimant indicated that she felt that her medical condition prevented her from climbing stairs, she failed to produce any medical documentation to support such contention. Given claimant's insubordinate conduct of refusing to perform her job duties, we find no reason to disturb the Board's finding that she engaged in disqualifying misconduct (see Matter of Bull

[Metropolitan Jewish Health Sys.-Commissioner of Labor], 116 AD3d 1325, 1325-1326 [2014]; Matter of Box [Commissioner of Labor], 50 AD3d 1431, 1431-1432 [2008]; Matter of Volmar [Commissioner of Labor], 24 AD3d 1155, 1156 [2005]).

Peters, P.J., McCarthy, Egan Jr. and Lynch, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.