Matter of Gager (Commissioner of Labor)

Annotate this Case
Matter of Gager (Commissioner of Labor) 2015 NY Slip Op 03000 Decided on April 9, 2015 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: April 9, 2015
518559

[*1] JONATHAN GAGER, Respondent. GANNETT SATELLITE INFORMATION NETWORK, INC., Doing Business as PRESS AND SUN BULLETIN, Appellant.

and

COMMISSIONER OF LABOR, Respondent.

Calendar Date: February 10, 2015
Before: Lahtinen, J.P., Garry, Lynch and Devine, JJ.

Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC, Syracuse (L. Michael Zinser of Zinser Law Firm, Nashville, Tennessee, admitted pro hac vice), for appellant.

James W. Cooper, Warrensburg, for Jonathan Gager, respondent.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City (Mary Hughes of counsel), for Commissioner of Labor, respondent.

Satterlee Stephens Burke & Burke LLP, New York City (Mark A. Fowler of counsel), for New York News Publishers Association, amicus curiae.




Lynch, J.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Appeals from two decisions of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 30, 2013, which ruled, among other things, that Gannett Satellite Information Network, Inc. is

liable for unemployment insurance contributions on remuneration

paid to claimant and others similarly situated.

Claimant delivered newspapers for Gannett Satellite Information Networks, Inc. under four separate contracts from March 2004 until September 2009. Gannett has appealed from two Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board decisions finding that claimant was an employee entitled to benefits, for which Gannett was liable for unemployment insurance contributions. The indicia [*2]of control retained by Gannett through the agreements with claimant are nearly identical to the factors identified to establish an employment relationship in Matter of Armison (Gannett Co., Inc.-Commissioner of Labor) (122 AD3d 1101 [2014], lv dismissed 24 NY3d 1209 [2015]). Accordingly, we find that the Board's decisions are supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Travis [Gannett Satellite Information Network, Inc.-Commissioner of Labor], ___ AD3d ___ [decided herewith]; Matter of Hunter [Gannett Co., Inc.-Commissioner of Labor], 125 AD3d 1166, 1167-1168 [2015]).

Lahtinen, J.P., Garry and Devine, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the decisions are affirmed, without costs.



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.