Matter of Pilgrim v Cunningham

Annotate this Case
Matter of Pilgrim v Cunningham 2015 NY Slip Op 05524 Decided on June 25, 2015 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: June 25, 2015
518295

[*1]In the Matter of PRINCE PILGRIM, Petitioner,

v

ROBERT F. CUNNINGHAM, as Superintendent of Woodbourne Correctional Facility, Respondent.

Calendar Date: May 5, 2015
Before: Peters, P.J., Lahtinen, Garry and Lynch, JJ.

Prince Pilgrim, Woodbourne, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Kate H. Nepveu of counsel), for respondent.



MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Sullivan County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Determination confirmed. No opinion.

Peters, P.J., Lahtinen, Garry and Lynch, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.