Matter of Lewis

Annotate this Case
Matter of Lewis 2015 NY Slip Op 07044 Decided on October 1, 2015 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: October 1, 2015

[*1]In the Matter of NEAL R. LEWIS, an Attorney. ON MOTION (Attorney Registration No. 1836071)

Calendar Date: September 14, 2015
Before: Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Rose and Lynch, JJ.

Monica A. Duffy, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany (Anna E. Remet of counsel), for petitioner.



MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Neal R. Lewis was admitted to practice by this Court in 1982. He was previously admitted to practice in Florida in 1978, where he formerly maintained an office for the practice of law.

By order filed February 20, 2015, the Supreme Court of Florida granted Lewis' uncontested petition for disciplinary revocation, with leave to seek readmission after five years (Matter of Lewis, 163 So 3d 509 [Fla Sup Ct 2015]). This order was premised upon, among other things, Lewis' failure to maintain certain required trust account records and his conversion of $92,500 in client funds from his attorney trust account. Pursuant to the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar, "a disciplinary revocation is tantamount to disbarment" (Rules Regulating the Florida Bar, rule 3-5.1 [g]; see The Florida Bar v Hale, 762 So 2d 515, 517 [Fla Sup Ct 2000])

The Committee on Professional Standards now moves for an order imposing discipline in this state pursuant to Rules of the Appellate Division, Third Department (22 NYCRR) § 806.19 by

reason of the discipline imposed in Florida. Lewis has not replied or otherwise appeared in response to the motion, and has accordingly waived his available defenses (see Matter of Halbfish, 78 AD3d 1320, 1321 [2010]; see also Matter of Morin, 131 AD3d 799, 799 [2015]; Matter of Radshaw, 130 AD3d 1139, 1139 [2015]).

We grant the Committee's motion and further conclude that, under the circumstances presented and in the interest of justice, Lewis should be disbarred in this state (see Matter of Hock Loon Yong, 130 AD3d 1428, 1429 [2015]; Matter of Felli, 116 AD3d 1335, 1335 [2014]; Matter of Goodhart, 56 AD3d 889, 889-890 [2008]).

Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Rose and Lynch, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the motion of the Committee on Professional Standards is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that Neal R. Lewis is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law of the State of New York, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that Neal R. Lewis is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; and Lewis is hereby forbidden to appear as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority or give to another an opinion as to the law or its application, or any advice in relation thereto; and it is further

ORDERED that Neal R. Lewis shall comply with the provisions of this Court's rules regulating the conduct of disbarred attorneys (see Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.9).



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.