People v Evans

Annotate this Case
People v Evans 2015 NY Slip Op 02147 Decided on March 19, 2015 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: March 19, 2015
104719

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,

v

DONALD W. EVANS, Appellant.

Calendar Date: January 20, 2015
Before: McCarthy, J.P., Garry, Egan Jr. and Devine, JJ.

Tracy A. Donovan-Laughlin, Cherry Valley, for appellant.

Weeden A. Wetmore, District Attorney, Elmira, for respondent.



MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Buckley, J.), rendered March 12, 2012, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of attempted assault in the second degree and driving while intoxicated.

In satisfaction of the charges contained in two indictments, defendant pleaded guilty to attempted assault in the second degree and driving while intoxicated. Under the terms of the plea agreement, he was to be sentenced to 1½ to 3 years in prison on the former charge and one year in jail on the latter charge, to run concurrently. He subsequently was sentenced as a second felony offender in accordance with the terms of the plea agreement and he now appeals.

Appellate counsel seeks to be relieved of her assignment of representing defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues that may be raised on appeal. Based upon our review of the record and counsel's brief, we agree. Therefore, the judgment is affirmed and counsel's request for leave to withdraw is granted (see People v Cruwys, 113 AD3d 979, 980 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]; see generally People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633 [2001]).

McCarthy, J.P., Garry, Egan Jr. and Devine, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.