People v Wheeler

People v Wheeler 2014 NY Slip Op 05467 Decided on July 24, 2014 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: July 24, 2014
105535

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,

v

KRISTIAN WHEELER, Appellant.

Calendar Date: June 9, 2014
Before: Lahtinen, J.P., Stein, Garry, Lynch and Clark, JJ.

Claire Sullivan, Monticello, for appellant.

D. Holley Carnright, District Attorney, Kingston (Joan Gudesblatt Lamb of counsel), for respondent.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Ulster County (Williams, J.), rendered October 10, 2012, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

In satisfaction of a six-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree. In accordance with the plea agreement, he was sentenced as a prior felony offender to eight years in prison, to be followed by three years of postrelease supervision. Defendant appeals.

Appellate counsel seeks to be relieved of her assignment of representing defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues to be raised on appeal. Our review of the record reveals that defendant had a prior nonviolent felony conviction and County Court incorrectly informed him that he faced potential sentences of up to 15 years (compare Penal Law § 70.70 [3] [b] [i] [up to 12 years where prior felony was nonviolent], with Penal Law § 70.70 [4] [b] [i] [up to 15 years where prior felony was violent]). Since such inaccurate information is a factor when reviewing the plea (see People v Garcia , 92 NY2d 869, 870 [1998]), there is at least one nonfrivolous issue. Therefore, without passing judgment on the ultimate merit of this issue, we grant counsel's application for leave to withdraw and assign new counsel to address this issue and any others that the record may disclose (see People v Stokes , 95 NY2d 633 [2001]; People v Cruwys , 113 AD2d 979 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]).

Lahtinen, J.P., Stein, Garry, Lynch and Clark, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the decision is withheld, application to be relieved of assignment granted and new counsel to be assigned.